- Industry
- Secondary-school exam preparation
- Period / scope
- 35-presentation system · pilot and first modules
01
The challenge
- A missing word can change the meaning of a rule or exception.
- Dense examples and tables require individual layout decisions.
- The teacher needs to keep editing the materials.
02
Key decisions
Approve the text before design
Every source was broken into semantic blocks; approved language could not be shortened, paraphrased or moved without verification.
In exam preparation, precision carries more value than elegant simplification.
Layout matched to the lesson
Defined distinct layouts for rules, examples, exercises and answers.
The teacher and student can follow the material more easily.
Separate content and layout reviews
The first pass verifies every approved phrase and the logic of each example; the second checks overflow, collisions, scale and mobile readability.
A single broad review tends to miss either a semantic error or a visual defect.
03
What changed
Prepared a workflow for teaching text and presentation design: slide structure, editable files and separate content and layout reviews.
More on the process and review
How the work is organised
- Inventory
- Text approval
- Semantic role
- System component
- PPTX + PDF
- Meaning QA
- Visual QA
How to assess the result
The 35 presentations describe the planned course scope. Completion is assessed against each accepted file.
What to check next
Check the materials during a lesson: text size, the order of examples and ease of use for the teacher.
Working on a similar challenge?
Discuss my project